Ramification group

In number theory, more specifically in local class field theory, the ramification groups are a filtration of the Galois group of a local field extension, which gives a precisely information on the ramification phenomenon of the extension.

Ramification groups in lower numbering

Let L/K be a finite Galois extension of local fields with group G and finite residue fields l, k. We shall write w, \mathcal O_L, \mathfrak p for the valuation, the ring of integers and its maximal ideal for L. It is known that one can write \mathcal O_L = \mathcal O_K[\alpha] for some \alpha \in L where O_K is the ring of integers of K. (This is stronger than the primitive element theorem and is a consequence of Hensel's lemma.) Then, for each integer i \ge -1, we define G_i to be the set of all s \in G that satisfies the following equivalent conditions.

(i) shows that G_i are normal and (ii) shows that G_i = 1 for sufficiently large i. G_i is then called the i-th ramification group, and they form a finite decreasing filtration of G with G_{-1} = G. G_0 is called the inertia subgroup of G. Note:

The study of ramification groups reduces to the totally ramified case since one has G_i = (G_0)_i for i \ge 0.

One also defines the function i_G(s) = w(s(\alpha) - \alpha), s \in G. (ii) in the above shows i_G is independent of choice of \alpha and, moreover, the study of the filtration G_i is essentially equivalent to that of i_G.[2] i_G satisfies the following: for s, t \in G,

Fix a uniformizer \pi of L. s \mapsto s(\pi)/\pi then induces the injection G_i/G_{i%2B1} \to U_{L, i}/U_{L, i%2B1}, i \ge 0 where U_{L, 0} = \mathcal{O}_L^\times, U_{L, i} = 1 %2B \mathfrak{p}^i. It follows from this[3]

In particular, G_1 is a p-group and G is solvable.

The ramification groups can be used to compute the different \mathfrak{D}_{L/K} of the extension L/K and that of subextensions:

w(\mathfrak{D}_{L/K}) = \sum_{s \ne 1} i_G(s) = \sum_0^\infty (|G_i| - 1).

If H is a normal subgroup of G, then, for \sigma \in G, i_{G/H}(\sigma) = {1 \over e_{L/K}} \sum_{s \mapsto \sigma} i_G(s).[4]

Combing this with the above one obtains: for a subextension F/K corresponding to H,

v_F(\mathfrak{D}_{F/K}) = {1 \over e_{L/F}} \sum_{s \not\in H} i_G(s).[5]

If s \in G_i, t \in G_j, i, j \ge 1, then sts^{-1}t^{-1} \in G_{i%2Bj%2B1}.[6] In the terminology of Lazard, this can be understood to mean the Lie algebra \operatorname{gr}(G_1) = \sum_{i \ge 1} G_i/G_{i%2B1} is abelian.

Ramification groups in upper numbering

If u is a real number \ge -1, let G_u denote G_i where i the least integer \ge u. In other words, s \in G_u \Leftrightarrow i_G(s) \ge u%2B1. Define \phi by

\phi(u) = \int_0^u {dt \over (G_0�: G_t)}

where, by convention, (G_0�: G_t) is equal to (G_{-1}�: G_0)^{-1} if t = -1 and is equal to 1 for -1 < t \le 0. Then \phi(u) = u for -1 \le u \le 0. It is immediate that \phi is continuous and strictly increasing, and thus has the continuous inverse function \psi defined on [-1, \infty). Define G^v = G_{\psi(v)}. G^v is then called the v-th ramification group in upper numbering. In other words, G^{\phi(u)} = G_u. Note G^{-1} = G, G^0 = G_0. The upper numbering is defined so as to be compatible with passage to quotients: if H is normal in G, then

(G/H)^v = G^v H / H for all v

(whereas lower numbering is compatible with passage to subgroups.)

Herbrand's theorem states that G_u H/H = (G/H)_v for v = \phi_{L/F}(u) where L/F is a subextension corresponding to H.

The upper numbering for an abelian extension is important because of the Hasse–Arf theorem. It states that if G is abelian, then the jumps in the filtration G^v are integers; i.e., G_i = G_{i%2B1} whenever \phi(i) is not an integer.

References

  1. ^ since G/G_0 is canonically isomorphic to the decomposition group.
  2. ^ Serre, pg. 62
  3. ^ Use U_{L, 0}/U_{L, 1} \simeq l^\times and U_{L, i}/U_{L, i%2B1} \approx l^%2B
  4. ^ Serre, 4.1. Proposition 3.
  5. ^ Serre, 4.1. Proposition 4.
  6. ^ Serre, 4.2. Proposition 10.